Sri Lankan cricketer Danushka Gunathilaka has been found not guilty of sexual intercourse without consent following an accusation of stealthing involving a Tinder date in Sydney.The 32-year-old was arrested in November while in Australia for the T-20 World Cup, after he went for drinks with a woman near the Opera House.He had chatted online for several days and then had dinner with the woman, who cant be identified for legal reasons, before being invited back to her eastern suburbs home, the NSW District Court heard.The Crowns case was that he removed a condom during intercourse without the womans knowledge when she had consented only to protected sex.The complainant told the court she did not see the batsman remove the condom, but saw it on the floor shortly after the intercourse stopped.Woman gave two different accountsJudge Sarah Huggett today found evidence about the genesis of the womans complaint undermined the reliability of her evidence.The judge said the woman had given different accounts in her two statements; the second, given in April this year, went into further detail about the issue of stealthing.But the judge said the complainant did not have a clear memory of what happened around the time she saw the condom on the floor.The evidence establishes there was no opportunity for the accused to remove the condom during the intercourse because that intercourse was continuous, she said.Judge Huggett considered the womans first conversations with two close friends, which seemed to frame the complaint in terms of the roughness of the sexual activity.Crown failed to establish womans reliabilityMr Gunathilakas defence counsel argued the woman lied, gave self-serving evidence and appeared to not remember parts of the night that were inconsistent with a narrative she created, which morphed over time.Murugan Thangaraj SC told the judge the Crown failed to establish the womans reliability and highlighted what he said were inconsistencies and implausibility in her version of events.He said it was completely illogical to claim she felt ambushed before lighting candles in her bedroom, effectively setting it up for a romantic sexual liaison.In court, the woman alleged Mr Gunathilaka kissed her forcefully on the way home and on her couch, where she felt ambushed before moving to the bedroom.She further alleged he choked her three times during sex, leaving her fearful for her life, and ignored requests to go slow.Judge Huggett found the woman was an intelligent witness who gave evidence in a considered way, and was overall a calm and responsive witness.But the judge said there were times when it appeared the complainant was motivated by a desire to paint the accused in an unfavourable light.Police interview played in courtIn his police interview, Mr Gunathilaka said he told her his preference generally was to not use condoms but wanted to on the night because it was their first meeting.In the interview, the cricketer made mention of there being two condoms because one malfunctioned which the Crown said was a deliberate mistruth.But Judge Huggett disagreed, finding that his answers were the result of confusion, fatigue, a language barrier and possibly memory.I formed the distinct impression he was doing his best to be truthful and assist the police, she said.Sitting in the interview room, Mr Gunathilaka told police the woman had organised him a taxi and he kissed her before leaving.She didnt even text me, I didnt text her also, he said.And thats it, then Im here.Mr Gunathilaka has been in Australia on bail since mid-November.Outside court, Mr Gunathilaka said the verdict says everything and that his reputation had been restored.He thanked his lawyers, manager, as well as friends and family back in Sri Lanka, saying everyone believed me, so that means a lot to me.Im happy that my life is normal again, so I cant wait to go back and play cricket, he said.Mr Gunathilaka said the last eleven months have been really hard, particularly being in Australia without his parents.Source: ABC News#13;-Agencies