Canceling the tracker layer upgrade to the spectrometer would also not be catastrophic.
The addition of a silicon tracker layer on top of the detector would increase the amount of data from the $2 billion physics experiment over the next five years by a factor of three.
However, the experiment has been in operation since 2011, so it has had ample time to collect information about dark matter and other fundamental physics in the universe.The real eye-catching proposal in NASA's options is reducing the crew size from four to three.Typically, Crew Dragon missions carry two NASA astronauts, one Roscosmos cosmonaut, and an international partner astronaut.
Therefore, although it appears that NASA would only be cutting its crew size by 25 percent, in reality, it would be cutting the number of NASA astronauts on Crew Dragon missions by 50 percent.
Overall, this would lead to an approximately one-third decline in science conducted by the space station.
(This is because there are usually three NASA astronauts on station: two from Dragon and one on each Soyuz flight.)It's difficult to see how this would result in enormous cost savings.
Yes, NASA would need to send marginally fewer cargo missions to keep fewer astronauts supplied.
And there would be some reduction in training costs.
But it seems kind of nuts to spend decades and more than $100 billion building an orbital laboratory, putting all of this effort into developing commercial vehicles to supply the station and enlarge its crew, establishing a rigorous training program to ensure maximum science is done and then to say, 'Well, actually we don't want to use it.'NASA has not publicly announced the astronauts who will fly on Crew-12 next year, but according to sources, it has already assigned veteran astronaut Jessica Meir and newcomer Jack Hathaway, a former US Navy fighter pilot who joined NASA's astronaut corps in 2021.
If these changes go through, presumably one of these two would be removed from the mission.