INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
By Marcus AshworthWith Mario Draghi halfway out of the door, the battle is on for the future direction of European Central Bank monetary
The nature of the contest is arcane, to say the least.
For a while now, the Banque de France governor Francois Villeroy de Galhau has been
At the moment, euro zone lenders are essentially having to pay to park their excess deposits with their central banks, putting a squeeze on
Tiering would exempt some of those excess reserves from the lowest rate, thereby lowering the cost to the banks.
This week, Draghi himself
conceded that the ECB needed to reflect on ways to mitigate any adverse affects of negative rates.
Still, the debate is far from over-.Klaas
Knot, the Dutch central bank chief, on Thursday poured cold water on tiering
That an old and complicated idea like tiering is being dusted off again shows the bank is in danger of running out of real policy options
to dissuade commercial banks from hoarding surplus cash, and instead encourage them to lend into the wider economy
Unfortunately, the opposite has happened every time Draghi has cut rates
huge QE and stimulus packages have singularly failed to promote lending
The transmission mechanism no longer works as the interbank market, and cross-border lending in particular, has dried up.
Messing around at
the margins of deposit rates would solve little and would only benefit the stronger banks with the most excess reserves
The potential savings may amount to just 7.3 billion euros (or about 6 per cent of euro-area bank profits)
Is this really worth it, when you consider that tiering has been shunned before in case it signals to the wider economy that the ECB is
hiking rates
If tiering was worth doing, it should have been done before rates were cut to negative, not as an afterthought now the economy
Indeed, this desperate scraping of the policy barrel is merely making people think that the lower level on negative rates will be here for a
long while yet and might even be cut further
