INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
Friday, joining allies Britain and France in launching missile strikes in retaliation for what Western nations said was the deliberate
gassing of Syrian civilians.The coordinated strike marked the second time in a year that Trump has used force against Assad, who United
States officials believe has continued to test the West's willingness to accept gruesome chemical attacks.Trump, speaking from the White
House late Friday, said the attack last weekend was "a significant escalation" of Assad's use of chemical weapons and warranted a
stepped-up international response.The alleged chemical weapons use was not the work of "a man," Trump said
They were "the crimes of a monster instead."Trump said the mandate for an allied attack was open-ended, but Pentagon chiefs later said the
Western strikes reportedly hit Syrian military bases (AFP)Gen
Joseph Dunford Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the United States military, in conjunction with British and French forces,
struck three sites - a scientific research center near Damascus, a chemical weapons storage facility near Homs and a storage facility and
command post also near Homs.Dunford said that unlike the unilateral United States strike in Syria last year, in which only one site was
attacked, the United States worked with two allies and hit the three sites in an operation that he said would result in the long-term
degradation of Syria's ability to research, develop and deploy chemical weapons.Defense Secretary Jim Mattis declined to say whether he
thought the attack would prevent Assad from using chemical weapons again."Nothing is certain in these kinds of matters
However, we used a little over double the number of weapons this year than we used last year," he said
"It was done on targets that we believed were selected to hurt the chemical weapons program
We confined it to the chemical weapons-type targets."Mattis said that to his knowledge there were no United States or allied losses from
the strikes Friday.Dunford said that the only communications that took place between the United States and Russia before the operation were
"the normal deconfliction of the airspace, the procedures that are in place for all of our operations in Syria."It was not immediately clear
how the Syrian military responded to the attack
Dunford said that Syrian forces fired surface-to-air missiles but that he did not have a full picture of the response
He said the Pentagon would provide more details Saturday.British Prime Minister Theresa May issued a statement saying the attacks were a
response to "circumstances of pure horror."In a statement, French President Emmanuel Macron said, "Our response has been limited to the
two United States warships in the Mediterranean Sea.The assault followed repeated threats of military action from Trump, who has been moved
by civilian suffering to set aside his concerns about foreign military conflicts, since the reported chemical attack that killed civilians
in a rebel-held town outside Damascus last weekend.The operation capped nearly a week of debate in which Pentagon leaders voiced concerns
that an attack could pull the United States into Syria's civil war and trigger a dangerous conflict with Assad ally Russia - without
necessarily halting chemical attacks.Both Syria and Russia have denied involvement in the attack, which Russian Foreign Minister Sergei
Lavrov alleged had been staged.The episode is the latest illustration of the hazards arising from a conflict that has killed an estimated
half-million people and drawn in world powers since it began as a peaceful uprising in 2011.The attack raised the possibility of retaliation
by Russia or Iran, which also provides military support to Assad, threatening in particular to increase the risks facing a force of 2,000
Americans in Syria, as part of the battle against the Islamic State
While the United States has not been at war with the Syrian government, United States troops often operate in proximity to Iranian- or
Russian-backed groups.In the wake of last weekend's gruesome attack, some United States officials advocated a larger, and therefore
riskier, strike than the limited action Trump ordered in April 2017, also in response to suspected chemical weapons use.That attack involved
59 Tomahawk missiles fired from two United States warships in the Mediterranean Sea
It fulfilled Trump's vow that chemical weapons are a "red line" that he, unlike his predecessor Barack Obama, would not allow Assad to
But the airfield targeted by the Pentagon resumed operations shortly after the attack and, according to Western intelligence assessments,
has presented Trump with a choice of whether to make a larger statement and incur a larger risk this time
Planning for these strikes focused on ways to curb Assad's ability to use such weapons again
Risks of a wider attack include the possibility of a dangerous escalation with Russia, whose decision to send its military to Syria in 2015
reversed the course of the war in Assad's favor
Since then, Russia has used Syria as a testing ground for some of its most sophisticated weaponry."Get ready Russia, because they will be
coming, nice and new and 's mart!' " Trump tweeted Wednesday, referring to United States missiles.That took military officials by surprise
But on Thursday, Trump said he did not mean to suggest missile strikes were imminent."Never said when an attack on Syria would take place,"
"Could be very soon or not so soon at all!"Since last year's strike, multiple chemical attacks have been reported in opposition areas,
most of them involving chlorine rather than the nerve agent sarin, as was used in 2017, suggesting the government may have adjusted its
tactics.Earlier Friday, Nikki Haley, the United States ambassador to the United Nations, accused Russia of lying and covering up for the
Assad's government had used chemical weapons at least 50 times in the past seven years of warfare, Haley claimed."Russia can complain all
it wants about fake news, but no one is buying its lies and its coverups," she said
"Russia was supposed to guarantee Assad would not use chemical weapons, and Russia did the opposite."Russia had called for the emergency U.N
Security Council meeting on Syria as military action seemed likely.Russia's U.N
President Donald Trump speaks of the situation in Syria (AFP)"Why are you seeking to plunge the Middle East into such difficulties,
provoking one conflict after another, pitting one state against another" he said, claiming that anti-government militias had received
"instructions" to begin an offensive as soon as an act of force begins
"Is the latest wave of chaos being unleashed only for the sake of thatRussia is Assad's most powerful ally and has thousands of troops and
military advisers, as well as air defense systems, deployed in Syria.Russia's military has threatened to shoot down any United States
missiles that put Russian lives at risk
Russia could also fire at the launch platforms used - potentially United States planes or ships
Russian officials have said United States and Russian military staffs remain in contact regarding Syria, even as Russian media have carried
stories in recent days about the potential outbreak of "World War III" as a consequence of a United States airstrike against Assad.Russian
President Vladimir Putin warned Macron in a phone call Friday the situation remained tense, the Kremlin said in a statement."Most important,
it is imperative to avoid badly planned and dangerous actions that would be crude violations of the U.N
Charter and would have unpredictable consequences," the Kremlin said
"Both leaders directed the ministers of defense and foreign affairs to maintain close contact with the goal of de-escalating the
Secretary General Antonio Guterres told the Security Council that he feared events could escalate rapidly into a regional and even global
airstrike operation by the British, French and USFrance's U.N
ambassador, Francois Delattre, said the Syrian government's decision to use chemical weapons meant that it had "reached a point of no
return," necessitating a "robust, united and steadfast response."France will shoulder its responsibility to end an intolerable threat to our
collective security," Delattre told the Security Council.British U.N
Ambassador Karen Pierce noted that May's Cabinet "has agreed on the need to take action to alleviate humanitarian distress and to deter
the further use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime."Announcement of that approval Thursday did not specify that the response should be
military, although that was the expectation."We will continue to work with our friends and allies to coordinate an international response to
that end," Pierce said Friday.Opposition lawmakers urged May to first seek Parliament's consent before committing to any military action
Nothing requires that May do so, but the convention is for British lawmakers to be given the chance to vote
Parliament is in recess but could be recalled for an emergency session.Meanwhile, a team of investigators from the Organization for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons arrived in Syria to look for evidence.(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by staff and
is published from a syndicated feed.)
