Maryam Nawaz tells why she was 'implicated' in corruption cases

INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
JIT investigation."From there cases against me were initiated
injustice and those who have dared to question the rotten, entrenched practice of bringing the elected prime ministers to their knees, on
reply is what Maryam added extempore to her earlier prepared reply.In Urdu, she also replied the question, and said that she knew why this
corruption reference is being formed against her
and extraneous consideration, indeed, I have been falsely involved on account of my commitment to the political cause of true democracy,
rule of law and constitution and for siding with my father who has on his credit excellent performance in terms of public welfare and
said.She questioned why she is facing this case and why she had to appear again and again before a joint investigation team (JIT) that was
I know why I am being kept away from my mother who is suffering from the fatal disease of cancer and I also know that in 70 years history of
Pakistan no woman ever appeared before the court that much times
My only crime is that I am daughter of Nawaz Sharif, but just like brave and proud daughters of Pakistan, I am standing firm with my father
I am standing with his narrative
refused to surrender before any kind of hardships, who refused to resign when guns took aimed at him, he refused world's pressure and make
Pakistan a nuclear power and the one who bravely suffered every kind of atrocities being committed against him by Pervez Musharraf
She said the perpetrators knew that when a case would be formed against his daughter, she will be dragged into the court, a traditional
his daughter
My father has taken up the flag against the 70 years diseases faced by this country
our traditions, daughters are being respected alike but the perpetrators deviated from these traditions of ours
it is a matter of record that although the trust deed declarations as well as the so-called BVI letters were available on the record in
Panama case, similar nature of allegations against her were the subject matter, yet, the Supreme Court in its April 20, 2017 order did not
stands amply demonstrated by now in this trial that the JIT was on an agenda to implicate the whole family by any means whatsoever
Wajid Zia has admitted that none of the witnesses examined by him has made any incriminating statement against me nor any other iota of
evidence whatsoever was available with the JIT
The malice on the part of the JIT flouts on the surface, the manner of engaging Robert Radley through Quist Solicitor, sending of MLAs and
receipt of suspect responses and concealment of response by BVI declining the MLA request speak volumes of malafide intention on the part of
said that she had never interacted or had any dealing whatsoever with Mossack Fonseca.About various questions regarding different documents,
Maryam raised questions about their admissibility and said that those could not be produced as evidence.About a certificate of Capital FZE,
at which base, Nawaz was disqualified, Maryam said the said letter does not relate to her
She however said that this purported certificate is not admissible in evidence under any provision of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984, or
any other law for the time being in force.About Jebel Ali Free Zone Authority (Jafza) letters, she also replied the same.Maryam repeated
that she has nothing to do with the establishment of Gulf Steel Mill, its sale and investment with Qatari royals, transportation of steel
mill machinery from Sharjah to Jeddah and establishment of steel mill there
She however said that there is no evidence worth name on record even to suggest that Qatari prince did not join investigation on her
instigation and persuasion
She said Wajid Zia is manifesting his ingrained bias and inveterate hostility towards her in deposing that it was on her instigation and
members deliberately and maliciously maneuverer not to examine Hammad bin Jasim in support of his letters, and Wajid Zia even resorted to
she produced the certified copies of trust deeds and her categorical stance is that the same were genuine
properties
She further said that despite availability of sufficient material on record of Minerva Service provider companies confirming the secretarial
management of the companies Nescoll and Nielson, since their appointment under instructions of Hussain Nawaz, the JIT or the IO of NAB did
not associate the management of Minerva Services Limited and other service provider companies with investigation with malafide intention to
that I ever issued any instruction or interacted with Minerva or any other service provider company for secretarial management of Nescoll
as these are not established to have been received in response to an MLA
To a question that why have the prosecution witnesses deposed against her, Maryam replied that the only witnesses who actually deposed
against her are those relating to the NAB or the JIT, or witnesses especially engaged by the JIT.As regards Akhtar Raja, she said, he is
first cousin of Wajid Zia and his ingrained hostility towards her and her family members is evident from the statement that he has made that
he had set up Redley's meeting with NAB officials.