INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
Responding to allegations levelled by the opposition regarding betting scandals, Minister Arjuna Ranatunge said in Parliament yesterday
that it was alright for them to sling mud at him as he is a politician and he is used to this
However, he said it was not fair for the opposition MPs such as Sumathipala and Gamini Lokuge to tarnish the image of respected cricketers
like Aravinda de Silva.Joining the debate on the Prevention of Offences related to the Sports Bill & Second Reading in a special sitting
convened in Parliament yesterday, he noted that an inquiry had been carried out under the leadership of Desmond Fernando PC on the inquiry
conducted on match fixing allegations of match fixing against Aravinda de Silva and himself and it was found that they were not guilty of
these allegations as noted in the CBI report
The report said that they had not found any evidence to prove that the two cricketers had engaged in match fixing.India CBI report had
stated in their report that Arjuna Ranatunge and Aravinda de Silva had fixed the Lucknow test in 1994 between India and Sri Lanka.However,
The SLC tasked a committee comprising Desmond Fernando with inquiring into the allegation, but it was abandoned, purportedly due to an
absence of adequate evidence.Ranatunge said that had Gamini Lokuge taken appropriate action when he was the Sports Minister, these rogues
ruining the sports in this country could have been punished
He urged the Sports Minister Harin Fernando, if possible to recommence inquiries into past incidents as well and punish those who are found
&I am prepared to go through the whole investigation again if required,& he said.He added that in 2009 he was the Chairman of the Interim
Committee and he had been side-lined for the Indian tour
&Generally on an Indian tour we get around $ 14-15 million
But, in 2009 they side-lined us and appointed the Secretary of the Sports Minister as the competent authority of the Cricket Board
In that tournament the agreement stated we were to get $ 6.5 million, but what we had taken eventually was around $ 3.5 million
So see what a colossal amount has been lost to the country
In such circumstances, these corrupt persons will definitely not want to change these laws
The people of this country must know these
This clearly shows what these sports ministers and secretaries have done to obtain money
I too would like if these matters are investigated
There is no purpose in coming to Parliament and making allegations and going home
All this time this bill had not been brought to Parliament by the successive sports ministers
We all know what Thilanga Sumathipala family business is
Sumathipala company had been engaged in betting since 1999, according to the ICC report
Many players had to face the investigations of the ICC and some were implicated and charged
But, I was cleard of all charges
There were several sports ministers who tried to put a stop to corruption in the sports sector but because of these corrupt officials, they
could not do so.
He said that huge money is to be made in sports such as cricket, rugger and Olympic sports and that is why such rogues
clamour to take up positions in these sports bodies in order to make money.Ranatunge tabled in Parliament the letter that cleared Aravinda
de Silva and himself and requested that a copy be sent to MP Thilanga Sumathipala and MP Gamini Lokuge, if possible translating it to
Sinhala, as they are the ones slinging mud in Parliament
The Prevention of Corruption in Sports Act was passed without amendments at the special sitting in Parliament yesterday.According to the
provisions of this new Act, under which, if any person found guilty of the offenses mentioned a fine not exceeding Rs.100 million or a
prison sentence not exceeding 10 years or both will be imposed
According to the provisions in Chapter I of Part II of Prevention of Offences relating to Sports Act, match-fixing, corruption, illegal
manipulation, and illegal betting is defined for the first time in Sri Lanka.&Any betting that is a financial or other benefit or
disadvantage to himself or another person, act in a manner that ensures the occurrence if any improper performance, acts, omissions or an
outcome, which is the subject of illegal betting relating to a sport or any sporting event
Providing with any inside information relating to a sport, any sporting event or any person, to any person including a betting operator,
other than in connection with bona fide media interviews and commitments
Provides or receives any gift, payment, reward or benefits, financial or otherwise, that might reasonably be expected to bring such person
any sport or sporting event into dispute,& outlined in the Act.In addition, any umpire, match adjudicator or match referee deliberately
misapplied their rules of the sports or sporting event for money or any other reward it benefits; any curator or member of venue staff,
ground staff or support staff receives money or any other reward to prepare any turf, ground or playing surface of any sport or disclose
information of the preparation and condition of the turf, ground or playing surface; and any person including a retired player or any person
connected to a sport is utilised by any person to gain access to local or foreign players in order to influence their performance for money
or any other reward are also covered.Sports Minister Harin Fernando presenting the bill to the House said that there were several amendments
proposed to the Prevention of Corruption in Sports Act, which they do not want to consider
&There were several amendments proposed to the Act
However, we don''t like to accept them
Why? Because these amendments were proposed by MP Thilanga Sumathipala,& Fernando observed
Minister Fernando extended his gratitude to Speaker of the House and the Prime Minister on calling for a special sitting in Parliament
considering the importance of Act.Speaking further Minister Fernando said, &If someone is against our attempt to curb corruption in Sports,
they are welcome to speak against this Act
We are not presenting this bill to take political advantage
We did not draft this bill
It was done by the Attorney General
I believe that all parliamentarians here will get the credit of passing this bill.&Joining the debate a former minister of Sports UPFA MP
Gamini Lokuge said that the Act on preventing corruption in sports should have been brought in 10 to 15 years ago.&We are not against this
But we believe that all who deserve penalties should receive them
It cannot be partial to one party
The law in this Act is effective only for the future
It would have been better if these laws were ex-post facto
There were many instances where corruption had taken place in Sri Lanka
But those who were involved were set free due to political influence,& Lokuge said.Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna MP Bimal Rathnayake joining the
debate said that bringing in new laws shall not entirely curb corruption
The politicians who encourage corruption should be removed as well, Rathnayake added.Half an hour into the debate Speaker Jayasuriya was
informed that there was a lack of quorum
However, the number of MPs necessary to maintain the quorum rushed into the chamber and the debate continued.Parliament will sit again on
December 3, 2019 following the Presidential Election.
Opposition not opposed to bill - ThilangaOpposition MP Thilanga Sumathipala joining
the debate on the Bill titled ‘Prevention of offences relating to sports& in Parliament yesterday brought up several issues that would
arise in implementing this bill practically.&He can either take this up at the Committee Stage or do whatever he wants
Firstly, the word offences has not been clearly defined
Further this bill mentions a certain Unit to be appointed by Sports Minister on the recommendations of the IG
However, under the current law, the IG does not have the power to establish an independent unit under him
Payments to this Commission would be made by the Sports Minister and we believe that this could give rise to complications,& Sumathipala
noted.He refuted allegations that the Opposition was opposed to this bill, adding that on the contrary, in fact they were very much in
favour of presenting this bill.&Currently, even when Sri Lanka loses a match there is doubt whether the match was fixed, the trust in the
players has been tarnished to a certain extent
Therefore, bringing in such a bill is in fact a good thing and it will help in rebuilding that faith and trust in us.&However, he said that
the Sports Minister needs to maintain his distance with the players and certain sports bodies to prevent any issues arising when
implementing this bill.The Prevention of offences relating to sports was unanimously passed without amendments in parliament yesterday.The
Bill, which sought to prevent offences such as match-fixing, corruption, manipulation and illegal betting in sports, was presented in
Parliament by Sports Minister Harin Fernando.The Bill also sought to strengthen national and international co-operation among sports
organisations, law enforcement agencies and betting operators, to exchange information relating to match-fixing, corruption, illegal
manipulation and illegal betting in sports and promote best practices in sports.Premajayantha calls for bridging trade gap between imports
and exportsThe hot topic these days on political platforms that the country could progress only by promoting innovation in utilising local
resources and coordinating human resources as a value addition in earning foreign revenue, said Opposition-MP Susil Premajayantha.Expressing
his views in Parliament yesterday during the presentation of the National Innovation Agency Bill, he noted that this bill has six objectives
&We need to bridge the trade gap between imports and exports thus strengthening the rupee
The institution for this purpose currently is the Commission for Innovators
But, this Commission only has a limited set of responsibilities
Although this Commission was sufficient in 1979, with today developments in innovation, the need for a stronger body has arisen
Hence, this Bill has been presented to fulfil that requirement.&However, he noted that the biggest drawback for new innovators is the lack
&As far as I know the annual amount spent annually for new innovations is around 0.11 percent of our GDP
Countries which have introduced new innovations and are ahead of us have at least allocated 2 percent of their GDP for new innovations
In the case of the US and other Western countries, it is the private sector that invests in the innovation sector for research facilities
The reason being that according to the nature of their trade, unless new innovations are found it would be impossible for them to progress
Therefore, all private companies are committed to funding research and development in order to stay on top.&Premajayantha noted that in Sri
Lanka the private sector is not strong enough to follow the example of the Western countries
Hence, until the private sector is developed to that standard, the government has no choice but to fund and invest in such research
facilities.According to Premajantha, during the Rajapaksa regime, the SLIT institution was established in Pitipana for research on Nano
technology.&Now the second stage has also commenced
At that time Nano technology was not widespread
There we did many research projects such as how to use cinnamon for the control of blood sugar and also Nano fertiliser production
Today there are 28 young people who have qualified in this field at that facility
The Rajapaksa regime recognised the importance of this institution at the time,& he said.He pointed out that Stem Education is being pursued
globally, but Sri Lanka has not even thought about it.&Sri Lanka population is around 22 million and rightfully there should be at least
22,000 researchers if we are to keep up with world innovation advancements
However, there are only around 5,200 researchers in the country and of them, around 2,000 are engaged in applied research and all the others
are engaged in fundamental research
But in our country the researchers do not have the resources to carry out advanced research.& Therefore, he said the government needs to
invest in such research projects in order to encourage and promote local innovators.JVP criticizes decision to grant a pardon to Royal Park
murder convictThe Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) criticized President Maithripala Sirisena decision to grant a Presidential Pardon to the
Royal Park murder convict Jude Shramantha Anthony Jayamaha, who was sentenced to death over the Royal Park murder case in 2005.Making a
statement during the debate on the Sports Bill in Parliament yesterday, JVP MP Bimal Rathnayake pointed out that the President move is a bad
precedent for future Presidents and it tarnishes the reputation of the country.&We should be ashamed as a country
All the main international media organizations have reported this incident where the President granted pardon to the murderer of a Swedish
This is humiliation to the entire country.&Rathnayake noted that the President should clarify the reasons behind his decision to pardon this
specific convict.&Why did he decide to pardon this specific convict when there are so many others who are more deserving of his pardon? Who
told him to do that? Was there any hidden agenda behind that? People are suspicious if there were monetary transactions behind this
The country needs to know the truth and the President should address these concerns immediately,& he noted.He also said that the President
has insulted all the women in this country as well.Subsequently, Non Cabinet Minister Ajith P
Perera said that there is a specific procedure in the Constitution of Sri Lanka regarding the Presidential Pardon procedure.&Before granting
the Presidential Pardon, the President must consult the Attorney General, the Judge who gave the verdict and the Justice Minister and call
But it is uncertain if the President had followed these procedures
I agree with MP Rathnayake point
The Parliament should consider this case.&A clearly irate Ratnayake then demanded to know why not a single Minister from the government had
spoken up against the President decision to grant a pardon to this convict
&You people are within this government and as a government what have you done about it? This government has so many media spokesmen, so why
has none of them made a statement in this regard? Has any one of them condemned this act by the president?&He also tabled the statement made
by JVP Leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake to be included in the Hansard in this regard.Shramantha Jayamaha was convicted of murdering
19-year-old Swedish national, Yvonne Jonsson on July 1, 2005, and was sentenced to 12 years in prison by the Colombo High Court.But, the
Court of Appeal dismissed that sentence and gave death sentence and the Supreme Court also confirmed that in 2013.Yvonne Jonsson was
residing at her apartment on the 23rd floor of the Royal Park complex in Rajagiriya
Her body was found on the 19th floor.President Sirisena last month said that he was considering to grant Presidential Pardon to Sharmantha
as he had served his prison term on good behaviour and had completed his doctorate.House unanimously passes National Innovation Agency
BillThe House unanimously passed the National Innovation Agency Bill at the special Parliament sitting held yesterday
Joining the debate, JVP MP Sunil Handunnetti said that a National Innovation Agency is crucial for Sri Lanka to become a developed country,
as scientific and cyber innovations will become the next most important asset in the world economy
He said that the agency will hopefully be able to create a solid data base including all the citizens who are currently involved in
innovation.Handunnetti also said that the government had added two amendments proposed by the JVP to the bill on the composition of the
agency board members and the qualifications of the head of this agency.&We are glad that a couple of amendments that we as the JVP proposed
There is a Commission on National Innovation
However, the Panel Board of the National Innovation Agency did not include a member representing the National Innovation Commission
So we proposed the government to add the Chairman or a Deputy Chairman of the Commission as a member of the agency panel
The government has accepted this amendment.
MP Handunnetti also said that innovations are crucial for a country like Sri Lanka as it cannot
rely on its land to carry out large scale economic activities.
We are a small island
We always have a limitation in the land
Say we encourage agriculture, there will always be a restriction in relation to the land
Social, business, scientific innovations are crucial for this country
We can go forward as a country based on digital technology and knowledge
We are country that has a generation which could conquer the cyber space
In the future, the power of a country will be decided not by the capital or the number of weapons it has, but by the fresh water resources
and a knowledge based society
In a future world where there is knowledge and water there is power
Our children have already shown the capacity to become key players in this cyber techno revolution
We are glad that this bill which should have been brought some decades back, was presented at least now,& he said.
