INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
We've been waiting for new desktop processors from Intel for what feels like an eternity
at Wccftech, these benchmarks appeared on Hong Kong tech site XFastest, and they don't look too hot for Intel
However, what might be holding this processor back is that it's rocking a tiny 65W TDP, which is much less than the 95W that its
predecessor the Intel Core i9-9900K features
processor don't boost super well when pushed to their limits, and even on single-core tests it doesn't hit the 5GHz that the Core i9-9900 or
Again, we can't even be sure if these benchmarks are real, but if they are it could very well be because Intel is cramming an extra 2 cores
in there without shrinking the manufacturing process down from 14nm.Anyways, this growth in core count with an apparent reduction in clock
speeds results in some pretty disappointing benchmark results
For instance, in Cinebench R20, the apparent Intel Core i9-10900 manages a paltry score of 3,714 points
Out of curiosity we ran Cinebench R20 on our AMD Ryzen 9 3900X with Google Chrome, Tidal and Photoshop still open and we managed a score of
This is the chip Intel is going to have to top on the high-end if it wants to remain relevant in the desktop space, and if these leaked
were only hitting around 68C
Either way with all the Intel Comet Lake-S leaks we've been seeing recently, we can only assume an official reveal is right around the
