May we live in interesting times

INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
It never a good sign when, in order to discuss the near future of technology, you first have to talk about epidemiology&but I&m afraid that
where we&re at
A week ago I wrote &A pandemic is coming.& I am sorry to report, in case you hadn''t heard, events since have not exactly proved me
wrong. The best current estimates are that, absent draconian measures like China&s, the virus will infect 40-70% of the world adults over
the next year or so
(To be extra clear, though, a very sizable majority of cases will be mild or asymptomatic.) I've updated my thread on the 40-70% statement
I made to @WSJ and @TheAtlantic
Tl;dr I'd now say likely 40-70% of adults (kids uncertain) unless very effective and long-lasting (thus burdensome) control measures can be
sustained
https://t.co/lXSfl6VyUl mdash; Marc Lipsitch (@mlipsitch) February 26, 2020 This obviously leads to many questions
The most important is not &can we stop it from spreading?& The answer to that is already, clearly, no
The most important is &will its spread be fast or slow?& The difference is hugely important
To re-up this tweet/graph from last week: The ultimate goal of such measures is to reduce the intensity of an outbreak, flattening out the
epidemic curve and therefore reducing strain on the health system, and on social economic well-being (see this graphic representation)
pic.twitter.com/fWOCq453Bx mdash; Josh Michaud (@joshmich) February 22, 2020 A curve which looks like a dramatic spike risks overloading
health care systems, and making everything much worse, even though only a small percentage of the infected will need medical care
Fortunately, it seems likely (to me, at least) that nations with good health systems, strong social cohesion, and competent leadership will
be able to push the curve down into a manageable &hill& distribution instead. Unfortunately, if (like me) you happen to live in the richest
country in the world, none of those three conditions apply
But let optimistically assume America sheer wealth helps it dodge the bad-case scenarios
What then? Then we&re looking at a period measured in months during which the global supply chain is sputtering, and a significant fraction
of the population is self-isolating
The former is already happening: Port of Los Angeles is projecting a 25% drop in container volumes this month, as the economic impact of
the coronavirus spreads across shipping operations and foreign supply chain
Imagine if 1 in 4 goods imported from Asia suddenly stopped coming
Impact just starting. mdash; Eric Lipton (@EricLiptonNYT) March 1, 2020 It hard to imagine us avoiding a recession in the face of
simultaneous supply and demand shocks
(Furthermore, if the stock markets keep dropping a couple percent every time there another report of spreading Covid-19, we&ll be at Dow 300
and FTSE 75 in a month or two&I expect a steady, daily drip-feed of such news for some time
Presumably traders will eventually figure that out.) So what happens to technology, and the tech industry, then? Some obvious conclusions:
technology which aids and enables remote work / collaboration will see growth
Biotech and health tech will receive new attention
More generally, though, might this accelerate the pace of technological change around the world? A little over a year ago I wrote a piece
entitled &Here comes the downturn& (predicting &Late 2019 or early 2020, says the smart money.&) To quote, er, myself: The theory goes:
every industry is becoming a technology industry, and downturns only accelerate the process
It plausible
It uncomfortable, given how much real human suffering and dismay is implicit in the economic disruption from which we often benefit
And on the macro scale, in the long run, it even probably true
Every downturn is a meteor that hits the dinosaurs hardest, while we software-powered mammals escape the brunt. Even if so, though, what
good for the industry as a whole is going to be bad for a whole lot of individual companies
Enterprises will tighten their belts, and experimental initiatives with potential long-term value but no immediate bottom-line benefit will
be among the first on the chopping block
Consumers will guard their wallets more carefully, and will be ever less likely to pay for your app and/or click on your ad
And everyone will deleverage and/or hoard their cash reserves like dragons, just in case. None of that seems significantly less true of a
recession caused by a physical shock rather than a mere economic one
My guess is it will be relatively short and sharp, and this time next year both pandemic and recession will essentially be behind us
In the interim, though, it seems very much as if we&re looking at one of the most disconcertingly interesting years in a very long time
Let hope it doesn''t get too much moreso.