INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
and Wales ruled in favour of India and Mukarram and Muffakam Jah in the case relating to whom the money belongs to
The bank subsequently froze the funds following an objection from the Nizam to the transfer of the money by Nawab Moin Nawaz Jung, the then
delivered last year.Najaf Ali Khan contends that the judgment by the court in UK was based on an invalidated certificate that was presented
by Mukarram Jah which recognised the latter as the eighth Nizam of Hyderabad
Khan contends that the certificate was rendered invalid after the Andhra Pradesh High Court in 1968 and the Delhi High Court in 1969 quashed
it as it was found to be in violation of Articles 363A substituting Article 366 Clause (22) of the Indian Constitution which ended
was presented in the UK courts and by presenting it, Mukarram and Muffakam Jah, violated the Indian Constitution.The Centre should take
action and defend the Constitution, he says, and hopes that this would render UK court verdict to be reopened and questioned and that
justice will be done to him and other descendants of the Nizam who are fighting for their legal share of the vast inheritance.
