China's Global Times calls media reports of 'border disengagement plan' inaccurate

INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
have been moving closer towards an agreement on a disengagement plan at some of the flashpoints, including the most contentious one, Pangong
and disregarded history, unilaterally believing that Fingers 4 to 8 (on the northern banks of Pangong Tso) are its patrolling areas, and has
sought to gain bargaining chips in talks by fishing for interests in the disputed border area
implementing any disengagement plan with China to end the six-month military standoff in eastern Ladakh.This is why India is moving
cautiously in dealing with any agreement with the Chinese side.After the Global Times report, the status of the disengagement plan will
plan are being discussed and finalised by the Chinese and Indian militaries are inaccurate and not helpful for the two sides to reach their
to some extent
In Pangong Tso, the Chinese Army refused to move back from the Finger 4 ridgelines
In Gogra Post and Hot Springs too, there was no clarity on any Chinese disengagement.