INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
"isolation."
The spiteful essay accurately reflects the United States' feelings toward Iran
We all know that the United States is furious with Iran, but why?The reason is simple
Iran has not abandoned its revolutionary philosophy
Let us not forget that it was this revolutionary ideology that pushed the United States to enhance its efforts to topple the system and
install one to power who would become its own puppet
Iran has refused to follow the world's big bully, the United States, under its revolutionary doctrine.The fight against arrogance is one
of the features of the Islamic revolution
Iran can come to a deal with the United States on two conditions: The United States must change its arrogant behavior, and Iran must
Neither of these two eventualities is seen to be likely
coerce or persuade Iran to reconsider its revolutionary ethos, but have failed
The reason is simple: United States -Iran normalization could prove deeply destabilizing to a theocratic government whose organizing
It's an honest admission from a reputable American media institution about the failures of past United States administrations
The second section, on the other hand, is pure fabrication.The essay then goes on and on about how Iran values the "right amount of
isolation," but it fails to see that the "global system," as it is referred to in the essay, is not restricted to the United States and a
On the contrary, Iran maintains extensive diplomatic contacts with countries all across the world, from Africa to Latin America.Later, the
essay goes to point out that one or two agreements between Tehran and Washington cannot solve a deep-rooted problem
with the exception of George W
Bush, all United States presidents have attempted to repair ties with Iran over the past 43 years
The notion appears to be absolutely false, given that the United States attempted to enter Iran militarily through Tabas during Jimmy
Carter's rule, but failed
Throughout the imposed war from 1980 to 1989, the United States continually supported Saddam Hussein by giving modern weaponry and giving
satellite image of the Iranian forces in the battleground.The subsequent United States administrations did not hesitate to apply harsh,
coercive sanctions on Tehran in order to bring the country to its knees
They have consistently backed armed opposition groups like the MEK (Mojahedin-e-Khalq Organization), as well as separatist movements in
Iranian provinces like Kurdistan, Khuzestan, and Azerbaijan.They openly supported Mir Hossein Mousavi, a presidential candidate who later
became an opposition leader whose true goal was to overthrow the system in 2009
They assassinated late General Qassem Soleimani, a valiant military leader who ended Daesh's (ISIS) power in Syria and Iraq and restricted
its influence to occasional operations now and then, and let's not forget that if he had been alive, he would have completely destroyed
The United States also assisted its best friend, the Israeli regime, in assassinating Iran's top nuclear experts in broad daylight, and
Iran, urges strategic patience
One is that the revolutionary powers do not live in a different world
Their perspective on the world is far broader than Cooper's .Furthermore, the statement demonstrates the United States' level of
displeasure and irritation with Iran, given that the underlying problem with Iran is that Tehran is a revolutionary government that does not
follow the laws set by Washington.Finally, the New York Times has brazenly targeted the Islamic Revolution's Leader
This is most likely owing to their proper understanding of the issue that the Leader is the captain of the ship, and he is a captain with a
precise and deep awareness of the nature of the United States
