SC counters Uddhav camp, says dy speaker to blame

INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
NEW DELHI: The Uddhav Thackeray-led Sena factions reiteration that the Supreme Courts June 27, 2022 order offering more time to Eknath
Shinde-led rebel MLAs emboldened them to fall of the MVA government with unconstitutional assistance from the guv drew a sharp response on
Wednesday from the Constitution bench, which blamed it on the then deputy speakers unreasonable action.Senior advocate Kapil Sibal stated
that if the court had on June 27 not provided the rebel MLAs, sitting in Guwahati, time till July 12 to respond to the disqualification
petitions, they all would have been disqualified and the MVA government would have continued
As these rebel MLAs clearly defied the party whip, they were per se (ex facie) disqualified, for this reason, there was no need of anymore
proof, he said
The guv, despite knowing that Shinde dealt with per se disqualification under anti-defection law, did an unconstitutional act of welcoming
him to form federal government, he said.The bench of CJI D Y Chandrachud and Justices M R Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P S
Narasimha stated, The SC may not have stepped in on June 27 had the deputy speaker not provided an unreasonable two days time for them to
respond to the disqualification petitions as versus the standard of 7 days
In any case, it is the Speaker who ought to be choosing the disqualification and not the courts
The bench stated, You have actually made a considerable point about constitutional democracy and the supremacy of a political celebration
over its members in your house
But if the courts begin choosing disqualification of MLAs at the first instance, instead of the Speaker, it would have very serious
ramifications
This holds true even for a case where an MLA is per se disqualified un-der the Tenth Schedule
This proposition is extremely disquieting for us
Right or wrong, there is a system in location appointing the Speaker the task of adjudicating the disqualification petitions
Can the courts breach the established constitutional system? Arguments will continue on Thursday.