INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
TEHRAN - The Washington Times on August 22 published an article titled "Biden's dangerous oral nuclear agreement with Iran"
The article, written by Jed Babbin, a national security and foreign affairs columnist, addresses the prisoner swap agreement between the
instead, Iran will dilute some of its 60-percent-enriched uranium
He labels the deal as a never-should-be-made deal since the diluted uranium can be enriched later
Western officials and media outlets keep raising concerns about Iran's peaceful nuclear program
Moreover, the recent prisoner swap has also turned into a hot topic that in the eyes of Western media, especially the Washington Post's
been illegally blocked in other countries for several years due to the United States bullying policy
It is the right of every country to have access to its assets
Yet blocking the assets and their repayment under any agreement cannot be considered a 'favor.'Second, according to the announcement of the
United States intelligence assessment published in the Associated Press on July 10, Iran was not developing nuclear weapons and was not
Meanwhile, Iranian officials have repeatedly emphasized that the nature of Iran's nuclear program is purely peaceful
program, the Western media outlets kept demonizing Iran's peaceful nuclear program
nuclear program and do not have any documents or evidence
But the fundamental question is, if Western and American officials are concerned about Iran's peaceful nuclear program, why did they
withdraw from the JCPOA? The JCPOA was an agreement that limited Iran's nuclear program to a large extent
United States pullout in 2018, Europe promised 11 commitments to Iran under INSTEX, which was not implemented
Inaction by the European side prompted former Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif to say "Iran will keep progressing with or without
to facilitate non-USD and non-SWIFT transactions with Iran to avoid breaking United States sanctions.For the Europeans, INSTEX was a
prerequisite for implementing their 11 commitments after the United States quit the JCPOA
It was supposed to become a mechanism independent of the United States sanctions and open the trade route to Iran and Europe, but it
defined itself under the United States sanctions and practically did nothing.Fourth, the claim that Iran has failed to comply with the
JCPOA agreement directly contradicts the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reports, which have proven Iran's adherence
The American officials have not made a claim that Iran is not complying with its JCOPA commitments
Even after Trump's exit from the JCOPA, Iran fully implemented its commitments for one entire year
After that, Iran reduced its commitments but remained adherent to the JCPOA
First, such an agreement does not exist, at least for now
Secondly, if such an agreement exists, which United States imposed sanctions on Iran have been canceled so far?
