INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
2024 elections.These laws, intended to protect public discourse, might instead amplify risks, posing a significant challenge to media
autonomy.A study by the Center for News, Technology, and Innovation (CNTI) examined such legislation in 31 countries, from Ethiopia to the
Philippines.Researchers at CNTI, drawing on data from the Center for International Media Assistance, Lexota, and LupaMundi, evaluated 32
over this definition, whereas 18 lacked clear guidance, consequently rendering government oversight by default.Election Integrity Threatened
(Photo Internet reproduction)This legislative ambiguity prevails across various regimes, impacting 12 democracies among the studied
nations.Severe penalties are on the books, with infractions leading to incarceration, notably up to 20 years in Zimbabwe.The findings reveal
stifle free press, undermining democratic processes.In 2024, a record number of national elections will raise concerns about access to
reliable reporting and potential media misuse to spread misinformation.These laws could stifle dissent and restrict press freedom, crucial
in electoral contexts.Laws designed to limit COVID-19 misinformation are vaguely worded, potentially restricting journalistic freedom and
language to ensure media rights are protected.The long-term effects of these laws remain uncertain, with potential chilling effects on
journalism.As journalists may avoid sensitive topics to evade legal repercussions, the center pledges ongoing monitoring of these
developments.Their upcoming work will involve policy analysis, surveys, and interviews to outline modern journalism amid increasing AI and
government interference.This ongoing research aims to adapt journalistic standards to our digital, global era.Download study here.
