INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
judicial system under the microscope.At the center of this storm is Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes
He not only oversees the case but was also a direct target of the alleged plot.This dual role has sparked heated debate among legal experts
itself.The stakes are high
Federal police investigations revealed a chilling plan by Bolsonaro supporters to assassinate Moraes, President Lula, and Vice President
aimed to eliminate key figures standing in the way of their alleged coup
(Photo Internet reproduction)Moraes is playing a central role in determining whether formal charges will proceed
scholars argue that this overlap creates a glaring conflict of interest
The European Court of Human Rights has long upheld the principle that judges must not only act impartially but also be perceived as
His critics argue that stepping aside would protect not just his reputation but also that of the Supreme Court, ensuring that justice is
seen as above personal or political interests.Supporters of Moraes dismiss these concerns as overblown
They argue that removing him would disrupt ongoing investigations into anti-democratic activities linked to Bolsonaro and his
He also oversees related investigations into fake news campaigns, digital militias, and the January 8 attacks on government
buildings.Critics argue that consolidating these cases under one judge stretches legal norms on procedural fairness and judicial neutrality
They suggest redistributing these cases among other justices to avoid further accusations of bias.The implications go far beyond legal
democratic institutions.On the other hand, if he steps aside now, it could reinforce public confidence in the judiciary at a time when trust
Moraes stays or goes will send a powerful message
It will reflect how seriously Brazil takes judicial impartiality and accountability at its highest levels.
