The end of an AI that shocked the world: OpenAI retires GPT-4

INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
OpenAI announced on April 10 that GPT-4 will be "fully replaced" by GPT-4o in ChatGPT at the end of April, bringing a public-facing end to
the model that accelerated a global AI race when it launched in March 2023."Effective April 30, 2025, GPT-4 will be retired from ChatGPT and
fully replaced by GPT-4o," OpenAI wrote in its April 10 changelog for ChatGPT
While ChatGPT users will no longer be able to chat with the older AI model, the company added that "GPT-4 will still be available in the
API," providing some reassurance to developers who might still be using the older model for various tasks.The retirement marks the end of an
era that began on March 14, 2023, when GPT-4 demonstrated capabilities that shocked some observers: reportedly scoring at the 90th
percentile on the Uniform Bar Exam, acing AP tests, and solving complex reasoning problems that stumped previous models
screenshot of GPT-4's introduction to ChatGPT Plus customers from March 14, 2023. Credit:
Benj Edwards / Ars Technica While ChatGPT launched in November 2022 with GPT-3.5 under the hood, GPT-4 took AI language
models to a new level of sophistication, and it was a massive undertaking to create
It combined data scraped from the vast corpus of human knowledge into a set of neural networks rumored to weigh in at a combined total of
1.76 trillion parameters, which are the numerical values that hold the data within the model.Along the way, the model reportedly cost more
than $100 million to train, according to comments by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, and required vast computational resources to develop
primary backer, Microsoft, could afford.Curiously, GPT-4's impact began before OpenAI's official announcement
In February 2023, Microsoft integrated its own early version of the GPT-4 model into its Bing search engine, creating a chatbot that sparked
controversy when it tried to convince Kevin Roose of The New York Times to leave his wife and when it "lost its mind" in response to an Ars
Technica article.