INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
The United States Supreme Court has sharply limited the power of federal judges to halt presidential policies across the nation, delivering
order seeking to end birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S
The Supreme Court now says judges can only block the policy for the people who actually brought the lawsuit.Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote
that judges exceeded their authority by stopping policies for everyone, not just the plaintiffs
The Court noted that class-action lawsuits could still block a policy for all members of the class, and state governments might be able to
(Photo Internet reproduction)Supreme Court Ruling Reshapes National Policy EnforcementFor businesses and families, this change means
government policies might now be enforced in some states but not others, complicating matters for those who move or do business across state
leading to more differences in how laws are enforced across the country.This Supreme Court ruling is not the first time Western countries
have acted against judicial overreach
In the past decade, both U.S
political parties have raised concerns about judges blocking national policies, and Congress has considered legislation to restrict such
actions.Similar debates have taken place in Europe, including in Poland and Hungary
This ruling is a major step, but it is part of a broader, ongoing trend in Western democracies.
