TEHRAN - Hamshahri went over the conference of the presidents of Iran and Azerbaijan in Baku in an interview with Mehdi Khorsand, an expert on Eurasian issues.He said: Today, we are seeing a foreign interventionist actor in the name of the Zionist program in the relations in between Tehran and Baku.
Nevertheless, the issue of ethnicity could be a factor in reconciliation in between Iran and the Republic of Azerbaijan.
Religious commonness can pave the way for wider cooperation.
The presence of ethnic and religious commonness has triggered Iran to adopt a tolerant technique to a few of Bakus unconstructive habits.
Tehrans method towards Baku need to remain on this path.
We should accept that bilateral relations are currently at a low level and we must move towards increasing the level of economic and trade exchanges, particularly by making use of border capacities.
By finishing the North-South Corridor, transit cooperation in between the two sides can be increased in the areas of freight and passenger traffic.
By increasing financial cooperation in numerous sectors, common issues can be lessened and the destructive role of interventionist actors can be prevented.Donya-e-Eqtesad: Deterrence through diplomacyDonya-e-Eqtesad dedicated its editorial to the tactical measurements of the Islamic Republic of Irans decision to begin negotiations with the United States and wrote: In the security environment of the Middle East, being watchful of dangers is a crucial element in deterrence.
The rapid execution of Operations True Promise I and II improved the reliability of the Islamic Republic of Irans deterrence in the tactical memory of the region.
The Islamic Republic of Iran showed that, with the reasoning of deterrence and with the goal of peace and stability, it does not think twice to perform military operations and, after changing the conditions for discussion, it takes company and definitive actions on the diplomatic path.
By performing military operations last year, showing military preparedness, holding regional diplomatic conferences, and clearly describing principled policies regarding the appropriate dedication to regional and global peace, the Islamic Republic of Iran has proven the credibility of its messages and led the way for reaching an arrangement (on its nuclear program).
Javan: We will strongly neutralize the illusion of sabotage in negotiationsIn an analysis, Javan addressed Netanyahus ludicrous rhetoric and stated: Amid the positions on the prospect of indirect nuclear settlements between Iran and the United States, Netanyahu claimed that Tel Aviv would just agree to an arrangement that would get rid of Irans capability to enrich uranium.
Netanyahus impudence is exceptional as he wishes to dictate to President Trump what he can or can refrain from doing in his diplomacy with Iran.
Netanyahu speaks against the settlements in a circumstance in which U.S.
President Donald Trump himself honestly or implicitly expresses optimism about the settlements.
Esmaeil Baghaei, the Foreign Ministry spokesman, states the Zionist programs authorities are attempting to make such statements with two objectives: one, to cast a shadow over the genocide happening in occupied Palestine, and second, to destroy any diplomatic procedure in the area.
They definitely know much better than anyone that any adventurism and wrong action versus Iran will be met a crushing response.Etemad: Constructive relations with the northern neighborRelations in between Iran and the Republic of Azerbaijan are diverse as they consist of historic, political, economic, and trade measurements.
In the political arena, cooperation and tensions have actually constantly belonged of Iran-Azerbaijan relations.
On one hand, both countries share typical interests in preserving regional stability and combating separatism, however on the other, geopolitical rivalries have actually made their interactions complicated.
Useful interactions, before developing issues in economic, commercial, and technological interests, can improve the several dimensions of the two nations interests and enhance the geopolitical and geoeconomic security of Iran and the Republic of Azerbaijan in the South Caucasus.
In these brand-new conditions, this useful aspect ought to be given special attention from a professional and technical point of view by the policymakers of the 2 countries, since the fantastic powers and local competitors can, as in the past, cause serious disruptions in the relations in between the 2 nations.
Specifically, the failure to finish the multiple diplomatic relations between Tehran and Baku will be an element that creates anarchy in the South Caucasus, and this is a preferable aspect for the West and Irans competitors in the South Caucasus.
This article very first appeared/also appeared in Tehran Times