
Jiang Bin, representative for the Ministry of National Defense, on Tuesday condemned Taiwan leader Lai Ching-te for hyping up the so-called mainland hazard in his recent speech.
Jiang made the remarks in action to concerns over Lais claim in the 4th installment of his prepared 10 lectures on unity.
Taiwan is a province of China –-- where does this so-called nationwide defense budget plan originated from? asked Jiang, rebuking Lai for his reference to the budget in his speech.Lai misshapes history and controls principles, wrapping his secessionist agenda for Taiwan self-reliance in carefully produced lies, the representative said.He likewise aggressively hypes up the so-called mainland danger, fabricates security issues, controls popular opinion in Taiwan, and seeks to militarize the local society in efforts to drag the future of Taiwan into the schemes masterminded by external forces, said Jiang.The representative said Lais call to defend Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu is in reality a call to fight for the self-centered interests of the Democratic Progressive Party and the separatist goal of Taiwan independence, which tries to deceive individuals of Taiwan onto a dead-end path of stoping reunification with military force, offering out Taiwan, and destroying Taiwan.
Both sides of the Taiwan Straits come from one China, and Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu are all spiritual territories of China, Jiang said, including that individuals on both sides of the Straits are all Chinese.The more Lai and his faction provoke, the faster their downfall will come, the spokesperson warned.
Armed forces supporting Taiwan self-reliance that function as accomplices to evil will only die along with them, he said.The Peoples Liberation Army has the confidence and ability to shatter all separatist impressions of Taiwan independence, and will resolutely safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity, Jiang said.Read more: Fossils do not lie –-- however Lai may: A look at Taiwans true pastLiving in an alternate reality, Lai requires a severe history lesson